How copyright owners report infringing material hosted on Athmane, and how affected users respond. Athmane is operated by RDTM Labs FZE LLC and follows the notice-and-takedown framework of the DMCA (17 U.S.C. § 512).
There are two ways to reach the agent, and both produce a record: the takedown-notice form (Section 2) or the counter-notification form (Section 4) — each hands you a reference number the moment you file — or email:
The agent above handles copyright notices only. Other abuse (phishing, malware, scams) goes through [email protected] or the report form; general legal questions go to [email protected].
If you believe content hosted on Athmane infringes a copyright you own or are authorized to act for, file a takedown notice. The form collects every element the statute requires and refuses an incomplete notice rather than accepting one that cannot support a takedown. You may also write to the Copyright Agent by email; either way the notice must include all of the following (17 U.S.C. § 512(c)(3)):
<name>.athmane.app, so that is normally the address to copy.Incomplete notices may not be actionable. Submitting a materially false notice may expose you to liability for damages under § 512(f).
A notice filed through the form is acknowledged immediately, on the screen that submits it, with a reference number of the form DMCA-2026-…. That reference is the acknowledgement of receipt — keep it, and quote it in any correspondence. We do not email a copy, so nothing about the acknowledgement depends on your mail reaching us or ours reaching you. A notice sent to the agent by email instead is acknowledged by the agent when it is read; there is no automated acknowledgement on that route.
On a notice that substantially complies with Section 2, we then:
We refuse notices too, and we keep those as well. A refused notice is not counted against the account it named, and the account is not told about it.
If your content was removed and you believe it was a mistake or misidentification, you may file a counter-notification (17 U.S.C. § 512(g)(3)). It must include:
You do not need to look that court up in our Terms, and this policy does not choose it for you: § 512(g)(3)(D) names it, and the sentence above states what it names. Our own choice of governing law and forum is a separate matter, still open, and it does not bear on a counter-notification.
On a valid counter-notification we record it and compute the statutory window: the material may be restored no sooner than 10 and no later than 14 business days after we receive it (§ 512(g)(2)(C)), unless the original complainant first tells us they have filed a court action seeking to restrain the allegedly infringing activity. The form shows you both dates when you file. They count weekdays only — a public holiday moves them later.
Restoring the material is not automatic in the sense of happening without us: publishing again is an action the account owner takes, and we lift the block that prevents it.
We maintain and reasonably implement a policy of terminating, in appropriate circumstances, the accounts of users who are repeat infringers.
We count validated copyright complaints per account. A complaint is validated when a person has reviewed the notice and we have acted on it — a notice that has merely arrived is not a strike, or filing complaints would be enough to terminate anyone. An account that reaches 3 validated complaints is in scope for termination review, and its published apps may be taken down; egregious conduct can bring that forward. Termination is a decision a person makes with the count in front of them, not an automatic consequence of the count reaching a number.
We keep the records the count is drawn from: every notice and counter-notification we receive, complete with its sworn statements, and every decision we record against one — including the ones we refuse. A refused notice is kept precisely so it is visible that it was not counted.
For trademark, publicity, or other non-copyright complaints, contact [email protected] with the same locating detail (URL + description). These fall under the Acceptable Use Policy rather than the DMCA process above.